{"id":3709,"date":"2011-03-02T08:55:07","date_gmt":"2011-03-02T16:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/?p=3709"},"modified":"2011-03-02T08:55:07","modified_gmt":"2011-03-02T16:55:07","slug":"gawker-redesign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/2011\/03\/02\/gawker-redesign\/","title":{"rendered":"Gawker Redesign"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t have much to say about the visual design of the Gawker sites. I am a regular visitor of only one of them, and I usually visit from a desktop computer. I don&#8217;t have any trouble getting around the new layout. But Gawker made one big error, and that&#8217;s in the functionality for directing visitors who link to specific articles on a mobile device (at least, on iPad and iPhone): visitors ends up at a listing of headlines, which may or may not contain the headline that interests them. If they even know what that headline is, since they may have arrived from a shortened link in a Twitter message, introducing the article with a cryptic remark.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s fine to say, &#8220;Keep your hair on. They&#8217;re working on a fix.&#8221; or even &#8220;Sounds like you follow faux-clever jerks on Twitter.&#8221; You&#8217;re entitled to that opinion. But a basic principle of sound Web design is to make sure the user always has a &#8220;scent of information&#8221; to follow. If users find themselves someplace unexpected, a good design will help them on their way. And that&#8217;s just for people navigating the site. If they&#8217;re following links to specific pages, getting them there should be a no-brainer. <\/p>\n<p>If a person follows a link to a specific page in your site, it&#8217;s just silly to think it&#8217;s perfectly fine to send them anywhere else. If your developer knows enough about the device making the request to shunt it to a different layout of the site, the site should be capturing enough about the link the user selected to get all the way there. If it dumps the user on a TOC page, your developer simply didn&#8217;t complete the job. And if hash-bangs, or whatever the new hotness is, don&#8217;t work well enough or consistently enough with the major pathways into your site, then maybe you should resist the temptation. Who knows? If an iPhone can&#8217;t find your page with your newfangled whatsit, maybe Google can&#8217;t, either.<\/p>\n<p>Those of us who have been using mobile for a long time are familiar with this half-assed approach. We&#8217;ve been seeing it on television and newspaper websites for years, going back long enough that some of us could kind of understand why a Web team&#8217;s use cases didn&#8217;t capture us. But that&#8217;s not the situation today, even for those legacy outlets. So why would a new-media darling, which surely has a massive base of users on the current It Device, whatever that may be, repeat such a classic old-media mistake? Engaged audiences already greet redesigns with suspicion&mdash;why not take the time to make sure the functionality is solid?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t have much to say about the visual design of the Gawker sites. I am a regular visitor of only one of them, and I usually visit from a desktop computer. I don&#8217;t have any trouble getting around the new layout. But Gawker made one big error, and that&#8217;s in the functionality for directing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[8,18,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-technology","category-words"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4OKzG-XP","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caitlinburke.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}